Comparison · AI strategy
Custom AI agent or generic ChatGPT
A ChatGPT subscription for the team, or an agent built on your processes and data. What your company actually needs.
In brief
For most SMEs the answer is both, at different stages. Generic ChatGPT is perfect for letting the team try AI right away, with minimal spend and zero setup. A custom agent pays off when a repeatable process (CV screening, reconciliations, ticket triage) needs to run on your own data, reliably and integrated. Rule of thumb: ChatGPT to assist people, a custom agent to execute a process.
Option A
Custom AI agent (proprietary data)
An agent built on your specific process, connected to your data and systems, that executes a repeatable task with an audit trail and your own rules.
Pros
- +Works on your data and systems (CRM, ERP, PDFs), not generic knowledge
- +Executes the process autonomously, not just suggests text
- +Serious governance: audit log, no LLM training on your data, AI Act alignment
- +Measurable results against an agreed target (e.g. 5h/recruiter/week saved)
Cons
- −Requires an upfront investment (Assessment ~2,000 euro, Sprint 10-50k)
- −Only makes sense on a repeatable, well-defined process, not everything
- −You need an internal owner to follow the project and the data
- −It has to be maintained and updated over time
Best for
- High-volume repeatable processes (recruitment, finance, customer support)
- Companies that must work on proprietary data with compliance rules
- Those who want a measurable result, not just individual productivity
Option B
Generic ChatGPT for the team
ChatGPT (or similar) subscriptions the team uses as an assistant to write, summarize, brainstorm and research.
Pros
- +Low cost and instant activation, no project to kick off
- +Great for getting the whole team familiar with AI immediately
- +Flexible: writing, summaries, research, first drafts
- +No commitment: scale the number of licenses up or down
Cons
- −Doesn't know your data or processes: generic answers
- −Risk of sensitive data pasted into an ungoverned tool
- −It executes nothing: stays an assistant, depends on the person using it
- −Quality and usage vary widely per person, hard to measure
Best for
- Teams that want to try AI with minimal spend and risk
- Variable, creative work (content, research, drafts)
- The early stage, before knowing which processes deserve an agent
| Criterion | Custom AI agent (proprietary data) | Generic ChatGPT for the team |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Executes a process on your data | Assists a person with generic text |
| Knows your data | Yes, integrated with your systems | No, general knowledge |
| Cost | Assessment ~2,000 euro + Sprint 10-50k | A few tens of euro/user per month |
| Time to activate | First delivery in 4 weeks | Immediate |
| Governance & compliance | Audit log, no training on your data, AI Act | Depends on plan, risk of pasted data |
| Measurable result | Against an agreed target | Hard, depends on usage |
The verdict
It's not either/or. Generic ChatGPT is the fastest, cheapest way to get the team using AI and to see where it adds value: keep it. But when a repeatable process needs to run on your data reliably and measurably, ChatGPT stays an assistant that depends on the person: that's where a custom agent belongs. The right question is 'do I want to assist people or execute a process?'. Many SMEs do both: ChatGPT spread for daily productivity, a custom agent built on the core process that weighs more.
FAQ
What people usually ask us.
Isn't ChatGPT enough if I give it access to my documents?
How much does an agent cost compared to ChatGPT subscriptions?
What about sensitive data? Is generic ChatGPT a risk?
Which one should I start with?
How long does a custom agent take to go live?
Not sure which one fits your case?
20 minutes with the CEO to work out the right choice for your processes. No pitch, no obligation.
Daniel Levis
Co-Founder & CEO